Practical Recovery

What if the insurance companies are right?

By Posted on August 12, 2016

By Reya Kost, Psy.D.

According to Fonthill Counseling, “Insurance companies count on your ignorance, laziness and distractibility to avoid paying for services they are legally obligated to cover.”  Any person who has been responsible for getting treatment authorized, or utilization review, will tell you it is like going to battle.  The treatment staff is armed with what they believe is undeniable evidence of their client meeting “medical necessity.”  The insurance caremanager is tasked with finding anyway possible to justify a lower level of care, hence a lower payout, for the insurance providers.  For any veteran of the rehab industry, this is a tale as old as time.  “It’s not enough time.” “How can they expect someone to make it after only a week?”  “They have barely finished detox, how can they be ready for a lower level of care?”

In the last 30 years of research, no conclusion has been made that supports a need for residential treatment.  “A research consensus is developing that states inpatient rehabilitation has no advantages over outpatient treatment and that even hospitalization for detoxification is unnecessary for 90% of patients (Cummings, 1991).”  Of course there is need for medically based detox services for some dependencies or for those with complicating medical conditions, however, it seems as though this is the exception, not the rule.

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Community Based Treatment can encourage behavior change directly in the community rather than in isolation.  The community can also support the person attempting behavioinsurance company denying claimr change by providing a wealth of other resources like job skills, nutritional education, and parenting skills.  There is a growing body of research that supports interpersonal connection, community belonging, and secure attachment as critical to creating lasting change (see Brene Brown, Gabor Mate, and the statistics on Portugal’s decriminalization). It seems as though we can surround those who struggle with substance use as a community and support them through the change rather than isolating and stigmatizing them.  Maybe stabilizing and integrating quickly in the community is the way forward.

Maybe the insurance companies are right.

For an innovative alternative to inpatient addiction treatment, check out our Individualized Intensive Outpatient Program.

 

Spirituality and Addictive Problems

By Tom Horvath, PhD A recent study found a helpful effect from having a “spiritual component” to one’s…

Rewards in Long Term Recovery

By Tom Horvath, PhD What’s the point of stopping an addictive problem if your life does not become…

Housing First Debate

By Tom Horvath, PhD Housing First project launches in Alaska, but the debate about housing first continues. Anchorage,…

How Are You and Food Doing?

By Tom Horvath, PhD Eating is an addictive behavior (not necessarily an addictive problem) we typically engage in…

The Continuing Debate About Addiction As a Disease

By Tom Horvath, PhD A recent scientific article entitled “Transcriptional regulation of ventral hippocampus-nucleus accumbens circuit excitability drives…

Substance Use and Risk of Stroke

  By Tom Horvath, PhD This recently published meta-analysis (a study, using rigorous statistical methods, to summarize the…

Podcast Interview on Sixty Plus Uncensored

By Tom Horvath, PhD Given that I will speak to as many audiences as feasible on topics like…

Pre-Existing Brain Structure and Later Substance Use

By Tom Horvath, PhD This finding is an opportunity to highlight the ABCD, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development…

Practical Recovery’s New Website

By Tom Horvath, PhD It was getting time to refresh the appearance of Practical Recovery’s website. A new…

Risk Factors in Long-Term Recovery

By Tom Horvath, PhD This study examined relapses in individuals who had at least one year of sustained…